• Home
  • /
  • Blog
  • /
  • Sea Level Falls, Temperature Plummets Off Sydney
Uncategorized

Sea Level Falls, Temperature Plummets Off Sydney

By jennifer
March 20, 2007

Earlier this year I spent a week at the beach, more specifically at Bluey’s Beach, on the NSW mid-north coast. My daughter and partner are both keen surfers. So, always in search of that best wave break, we also visited Boomerang, Elizabeth, Seal Rocks and a few other beaches.

I’m used to southeast Queensland with the summer water temperature a very pleasant 26C or so, and expected the same in NSW.

But the first day we went surfing it was a very cold 14C!

So much for the global warming of sea temperatures I thought as I shivered on the beach that day.

The locals explained that it was unusual, but they didn’t seem to have a good explanation. Interestingly, the water wasn’t so cold every day or at every beach.

According to a recent article in Sydney's The Daily Telegraph a “massive, mysterious whirlpool of cold water” formed off Sydney in January and is still active “forcing the sea surface to fall almost 1m and ocean currents to change course”.

So sea levels are falling off Sydney?

According to the CSIRO, oceanographers have identified a huge, dense mass of cold water off Sydney but know very little about what causes it.

"What we do know is that this is a very powerful natural feature which tends to push everything else aside – even the mighty East Australian Current,” says CSIRO’s Dr David Griffin.

Dr Griffin, from the Wealth from Oceans Flagship Research program, said cold-water eddies regularly appear off Sydney.

“Until 20 years ago we would not have known they even existed without accidentally steaming through them on a research vessel,” he said.

“However, now that we can routinely identify them from space via satellite, marine scientists can evaluate their role as a source of life in the marine ecosystem.”

Reaching to a depth of more than 1000m, the 200km diameter ocean eddy has a rotational period of about seven days. Its centre is about 100km directly offshore from Sydney.” [end of quote]

Now I’m waiting for a best AGW explanation for this dramatic, even if localized and ephemeral, drop in sea level and sea temperature.

Good Causes

Comments

  1. Привет.
    Продаю персональный сертификат WebMoney за $99.

    Можете проверить: WMID 322973398779 Redfern

    Всё чисто, не одной жалоб. Сделан на утерянные документы. Всё законно.
    Если нужно, то есть сертификаты ещё.
    Стучацо в личную почту на Вебмани.

    Это не спам. Не пишите на мой WMID жалобы в арбитраж Вебмани.

  2. For heavens sake Arnost - (1) solar + CO2 (2) aerosols. Re-read all of above with eyes open.

    So in return Arnost - solar can't have caused the warming in the last 30 years - what did?

    Why is it dodgy - simply because you "don't like it". What's so difficult about more greenhouse gases. It's pretty basic isn't it?

    Again no response on other lines of evidence. Sigh. Mono-directional.

  3. Luke

    My problem is that CO2 couldn't have caused the warming in the early part of last century. CO2 certainly did'nt cause the cooling in the middle.

    So what did?

    Attributing "global warming" solely to CO2 is a dodgy at best.

    cheers Arnost

  4. Arnost - mate - you've got a large problem - and we're going to sort this out by reading the actual paper - but they've measured optical parameters with real data - you wanna argue with that?

    "For the period 1883-1990, aerosol optical depths are estimated from optical extinction data, whose quality increases with time over that period"

    So who says any of these volcanic events were discarded. Arnost you're just raving. How ould you like to model the volcanicc effects given you don't like what the IPCC is doing? Your alternative is what?

    What's your issue with p 961 anyway?

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *