• Home
  • /
  • Blog
  • /
  • G8 Declaration on Fighting Climate Change
Uncategorized

G8 Declaration on Fighting Climate Change

By jennifer
June 8, 2007

Climate change has dominated discussions at the three day summit of the Group of Eight (G8) leading industrial economies which began on Wednesday in Heiligendamm, Germany.

Those section of the G8 Summit Declaration of the 7th June 2007 which relate to flighting climate change include:

40. Humanity today faces the key interlinked challenges of avoiding dangerous climate change and ensuring secure and stable supplies of energy. Since we met in Gleneagles, science has more clearly demonstrated that climate change is a long term challenge that has the potential to seriously damage our natural environment and the global
economy. We firmly agree that resolute and concerted international action is urgently needed in order to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions and increase energy security. Tackling climate change is a shared responsibility of all, and can and must be undertaken in a way that supports growth in developing, emerging and industrialised
economies, while avoiding economic distortions.

41. We recognise the important opportunities offered by effective action addressing climate change, in particular for innovation, technological development as well as poverty reduction. Strong economies together with a wide range of policy instruments such as market-based mechanisms, including emissions-trading, tax incentives, and regulatory measures as well as technology cooperation and a shared long-term vision, are key to guide investment decisions, to generate technology commercialisation, to enhance energy security, to promote sustainable development and to slow, stabilize and then significantly cut global emissions of greenhouse gases.

42. We are committed to take strong leadership in combating climate change. We confirm our determination to work among ourselves and with the global community on global solutions that address climate change while supporting growth and economic development. We commit ourselves to implement approaches which optimally combine
effective climate protection with energy security. To this end, we are committed to the further development of the international regime to combat climate change, especially in the run-up to the UN Climate Change Conference in Indonesia at the end of this year. Addressing climate change is a long term issue that will require global participation and a diversity of approaches to take into account differing circumstances.

43. Energy is a fundamental driver of growth and development around the world, and the use of energy has been steadily expanding along with the world's populations and economies. Our ability to provide secure access to clean, affordable and safe sources of energy to maintain global economic growth complements our desire to protect our environment. Addressing the challenge of energy security will require unprecedented
international cooperation in several areas, including market transparency, enhancing energy efficiency, diversifying energy supplies and developing and deploying new and transformational technologies.

48. We take note of and are concerned about the recent UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports. The most recent report concluded both, that global temperatures are rising, that this is caused largely by human activities and, in addition, that for increases in global average temperature, there are projected to be major
changes in ecosystem structure and function with predominantly negative consequences for biodiversity and ecosystems, e.g. water and food supply.

49. We are therefore committed to taking strong and early action to tackle climate change in order to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Taking into account the scientific knowledge as represented in the recent IPCC reports, global greenhouse gas emissions must stop rising, followed by substantial global emission reductions. In setting
a global goal for emissions reductions in the process we have agreed today involving all major emitters, we will consider seriously the decisions made by the European Union, Canada and Japan which include at least a halving of global emissions by 2050. We commit to achieving these goals and invite the major emerging economies to join us
in this endeavour.

50. As climate change is a global problem, the response to it needs to be international. We welcome the wide range of existing activities both in industrialised and developing countries. We share a long-term vision and agree on the need for frameworks that will accelerate action over the next decade. Complementary national, regional and global
policy frameworks that co-ordinate rather than compete with each other will strengthen the effectiveness of the measures. Such frameworks must address not only climate change but also energy security, economic growth, and sustainable development objectives in an integrated approach. They will provide important orientation for the necessary future investment decisions.

51. We stress that further action should be based on the UNFCCC principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities. We reaffirm, as G8 leaders, our responsibility to act. We acknowledge the continuing leadership role that developed economies have to play in any future climate change efforts to reduce global emissions, so that all countries undertake effective climate commitments tailored to their
particular situations. We recognise however, that the efforts of developed economies will not be sufficient and that new approaches for contributions by other countries are needed. Against this background, we invite notably the emerging economies to address the increase in their emissions by reducing the carbon intensity of their economic development.

52. We acknowledge that the UN climate process is the appropriate forum for negotiating future global action on climate change. We are committed to moving forward in that forum and call on all parties to actively and constructively participate in the UN Climate Change Conference in Indonesia in December 2007 with a view to achieving a comprehensive post 2012-agreement (post Kyoto-agreement) that should include all major
emitters.

53. To address the urgent challenge of climate change, it is vital that major economies that use the most energy and generate the majority of greenhouse gas emissions agree on a detailed contribution for a new global framework by the end of 2008 which would contribute to a global agreement under the UNFCCC by 2009.

We therefore reiterate the need to engage major emitting economies on how best to address the challenge of climate change. We embrace efforts to work with these countries on long term strategies. To this end, our representatives have already met with the representatives of Brazil, China, India, Mexico and South Africa in Berlin on 4 May 2007. We will continue to meet with high representatives of these and other major energy
consuming and greenhouse gas emitting countries to consider the necessary components for successfully combating climate change. We welcome the offer of the United States to host such a meeting later this year. This major emitters' process should include, inter alia, national, regional and international policies, targets and plans, in line with national circumstances, an ambitious work program within the UNFCCC, and the development and deployment of climate-friendly technology.

The full G8 Summit declaration can be found at:
http://www.g-8.de/Content/DE/Artikel/G8Gipfel/Anlage/2007-06-07-gipfeldokument-wirtschaft-eng,property=publicationFile.pdf

Good Causes

Comments

  1. Thanks Arnost,
    Although not an expert in the field, the recent advances in tectonics/climate seem very important to me. It's one of those 'big ideas' where the penny takes a while to drop with the news media, politicians, and even some in the scientific community. Hypothesis only so far, but a viable hypothesis, backed by deep thinking. It may, of course, be resisted, and ridiculed, by those who see it as a potential cause of an RFD (Research Funding Drought) in their area. RFDs can be caused by NILF (New Idea Leap Frogging).

  2. We all get carried away with anomalies and statistics - don't we...?

    Consider the SST "anomaly" map:

    http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst_anom.html

    And compare it to the SST "temperature" map:

    http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst.html

    Many of the "anomalies" are just not evidenced in the "temperature" graph. What really is happening is that the "anomalous" hot and cold spots are really anomalies only because sombody drew a line in the sand and defined an average teperature for that spot.

    The area around the Galapagos is where the (deep sea) Humboldt Current upwells.

    http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/ritter/images/maps/ocean_currents.jpg

    Just as the Gulf Stream is naturally warmer than the surrounding SSTs, the Humboldt Current upwelling is naturally colder than the surrounding SSTs. So one can argue that what is evidenced right now, i.e. a cold pool around the Galapagos is "normal" and there really should not be a cold "anomaly".

    The Humboldt can cause a cold upwelling, but there is however no explanation of how a warm sub-surface pool can eventuate. There is no known mechanism that will drive massive amounts of warm water down many 100's of meters below the surface. Note: there typically are no deep benthic temperature measurements below a couple of hundred meters - so any "anomalous" warm water (see the rise of warm water in this example of the 1998 El Nino http://meteora.ucsd.edu/~pierce/elnino/en97/en97.html ) may well be much deeper. So I'm with Davey on this one... As I said in my January 29, 2007 10:21 PM post here:

    https://climatelab.com.au/blog/archives/001856.html

    the tectonic / undersea volcanic origin of El Nino is not to be discounted - it's one of those "we just don't know" areas.

    cheers

    Arnost

  3. El Nino explains about half the rainfall variation in eastern Australia. But there are other drought causes in non-ENSO "neutral years" e.g. one example being latitude of the high pressure belts. But yep ENSO is a big deal. And so is the IPO in enhancing or decreasing ENSO effects.

    Someone once said you could predict the fortunes of the Australian economy on the value of the American Dollar and the SOI (Southern Oscillation Index - a measure of ENSO).

    Of course you could postulate that El Nino might have a number of mechanisms?? Certainly the climatologists do look for westerley wind bursts at the right time of year for event initiation. There's also a fair bit of work involving volcanoes and El Nino but on atmospheric aerosol cooling.

    I couldn't find any great progress by Leybourne on Google Scholar since 2001.

    IMO volcanoes are edge embroidery on the climate fabric but not the main garment.

    Davey - some people say we should put much more effort into seasonal forecasting than climate change - of course learning to live with climate variation is a good adaptation to climate change.

    Go on - ask the next question - will AGW affect El Nino frequency.

  4. Luke,
    Checking back, I see you are correct. The antarctic volcano (discovered 2004) was discussed in October 2006, but I was in Japan, sweltering in Osaka humidity, and viewing the brown smog from the top of Osaka Castle. On the same thread, Rog predicted the drought would be 'decisively broken by drenching rains before the next federal election', and you agreed. Spot on. So do you agree that ENSO is responsible for the repeated droughts and floods of eastern Australian history? And what causes El Nino? I think the geophysicists and vulcanologists are on to something, Louis Hissink notwithstanding. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, in the belief that it is a right wing conspiracy. As a born-again greenie, I think the antarctic (and other volcanic areas such as Indonesia) may prove to be the keys to many climate puzzles.
    P.S. Sid, do you have a reference to your comment on CO2 emitted by Mt. St. Helen? It sounds surprising to me, but I'm open to sound information.
    P.P.S. Luke, I don't know where Bruce Leybourne stands right now. Can we rely on your Advanced Google Scholarship to find out? No cheating now ...

  5. Davey - that exact paper - not sure from your search string. However why El Ninos follow a seasonal pattern. You also have the westerly wind burst and delayed oscillator theories. My further objection is the speed at which Los Ninos develop. And how do you also explain La Nina ?

    Has Leybourne progressed beyond the theoretical?

  6. Davey we discussed the newly discovered volcano in the Antarctica Sound in October 2006. https://climatelab.com.au/blog/archives/001698.html

    The volcano is near the tip of the Peninsula not near the ice shelves.

    If you read up they have to able to determine "slight" temperature anomalies near the dome. "Slight".

    Interestingly with no active volcano and a good proxy for the Southern Ocean temperature conditions - Macquarie Island is up up up.

    http://www.bom.gov.au/bmrc/clfor/cfstaff/nnn/RMSconf.ppt#338,28,Macquarie Island & surrounding SSTs

    A few undersea burbles don't give you global warming. IMO of course.

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *