• Home
  • /
  • Blog
  • /
  • Bunny fence prompts land use study in Western Australia
Uncategorized

Bunny fence prompts land use study in Western Australia

By jennifer
August 15, 2007

There's an interesting article in The New York Times entitled 'At Australia’s Bunny Fence, Variable Cloudiness Prompts Climate Study.'

"A fence built to prevent rabbits from entering the Australian outback has unintentionally allowed scientists to study the effects of land use on regional climates.

The rabbit-proof fence in Western Australia was completed in 1907 and stretches about 2,000 miles. It acts as a boundary separating native vegetation from farmland. Within the fence area, scientists have observed a strange phenomenon: above the native vegetation, the sky is rich in rain-producing clouds. But the sky on the farmland side is clear.

Researchers led by Tom Lyons of Murdoch University in Australia and Udaysankar S. Nair of the University of Alabama in Huntsville have come up with three possible explanations for this difference in cloudiness.

One theory is that the dark native vegetation absorbs and releases more heat into the atmosphere than the light-colored crops. These native plants release heat that combines with water vapor from the lower atmosphere, resulting in cloud formation.

Another hypothesis is that the warmer air on the native scrubland rises, creating a vacuum in the lower atmosphere that is then filled by cooler air from cropland across the fence. As a result, clouds form on the scrubland side.

A third idea is that a high concentration of aerosols — particles suspended in the atmosphere — on the agricultural side results in small water droplets and a decrease in the probability of rainfall. On the native landscape, the concentration of aerosols is lower, translating into larger droplets and more rainfall.

Within the last few decades, about 32 million acres of native vegetation have been converted to croplands west of the bunny fence. On the agricultural side of the fence, rainfall has been reduced by 20 percent since the 1970s."

Good Causes

Comments

  1. The New York Times starts off on the wrong foot. The RPF No. 1 (north-south) was not built to prevent rabbits entering the outback. It was the other way round, to prevent rabbits from the outback (east) entering the inback (west). As Paul says, it, and RPF No. 2 (east-west) both failed with regard to bunnies.

  2. rog made a good comment "...You would have to monitor humidity and prevailing winds for a clearer picture."

    It makes me wonder why no weather balloons have been launched on both sides of the fence under calm conditions, preferably on the same day so that temperatures were comparable. They'd collect the necessary data and help clarify what is really happening.

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *