See the power of propaganda, groupthink and mass delusion. US Networks blind in one eye.
‘Recent years’ slowdown in global warming completely ignored by networks 92 climate change stories in 2013.
‘Stories citing experts or the latest studies promoting alarmism get covered more than 8 times as often as critical experts and studies.
‘Although many scientists say no, ABC, CBS and NBC continue to link weather events like tornadoes, hurricanes, heat waves and more to climate change nearly one-fourth of the time.’
Neville complains about me not answering questions and he's just done the biggest runner with the great big sooky "I don't care" - oooooo.
"Before this the CSIRO has shown that extra co2 provided a 16% boost to cereal crops" but CSIRO can't be trusted - so why do you believe that. Selective eh?
Before this the CSIRO has shown that extra co2 provided a 16% boost to cereal crops and assisted with drought tolerance as well.
Just thought I'd throw another part of this mitigation of co2 fraud into the ring. I've written about this elephant in the room over the years but we can't get a sensible answer because it so clearly defies common sense.
If co2 is such a problem for the future of our planet, then we should immediately stop exporting coal , gas, iron ore etc.
I mean we are trying to cut back like crazy in the OECD but exporting every tonne of fossil fuels that any country wants to buy. And trying to increase tonnages every year.
In OZ's case the small tonnage we use at home is zip compared to the increased tonnages we strive to export every year.
This just proves this fraud is all about political philosophy and has nothing to do with the so called dangers of increased co2 emissions
All of our exports help to increase new jobs and industry overseas but we have to rely on fraudulent, super expensive and unreliable solar and wind energy at home.
Just more proof that this is the most easily understood and greatest con and fraud in recent history.
See the power of propaganda, groupthink and mass delusion. US Networks blind in one eye.
‘Recent years’ slowdown in global warming completely ignored by networks 92 climate change stories in 2013.
‘Stories citing experts or the latest studies promoting alarmism get covered more than 8 times as often as critical experts and studies.
‘Although many scientists say no, ABC, CBS and NBC continue to link weather events like tornadoes, hurricanes, heat waves and more to climate change nearly one-fourth of the time.’
Julia Seymour / WSJ
Settle down bruvver, the UAH is up slightly which should give your side some cheer.
http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_June_2013_v5.6.png
Neville complains about me not answering questions and he's just done the biggest runner with the great big sooky "I don't care" - oooooo.
"Before this the CSIRO has shown that extra co2 provided a 16% boost to cereal crops" but CSIRO can't be trusted - so why do you believe that. Selective eh?
The CSIRO confirms Matt Ridley's video covering the research that proves that the planet is becoming greener.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/08/deserts-greening-from-rising-co2/#more-89510
Before this the CSIRO has shown that extra co2 provided a 16% boost to cereal crops and assisted with drought tolerance as well.
Just thought I'd throw another part of this mitigation of co2 fraud into the ring. I've written about this elephant in the room over the years but we can't get a sensible answer because it so clearly defies common sense.
If co2 is such a problem for the future of our planet, then we should immediately stop exporting coal , gas, iron ore etc.
I mean we are trying to cut back like crazy in the OECD but exporting every tonne of fossil fuels that any country wants to buy. And trying to increase tonnages every year.
In OZ's case the small tonnage we use at home is zip compared to the increased tonnages we strive to export every year.
This just proves this fraud is all about political philosophy and has nothing to do with the so called dangers of increased co2 emissions
All of our exports help to increase new jobs and industry overseas but we have to rely on fraudulent, super expensive and unreliable solar and wind energy at home.
Just more proof that this is the most easily understood and greatest con and fraud in recent history.
And Luke, how about the correlation of temperature and CO2, especially that bit to the far right.
The great GHG theory:
http://www.brighton73.freeserve.co.uk/gw/paleo/400000yearslarge.gif
eg, I hope for his sake he was also speaking TIC about entropy.
As you are probably aware, I'm supporting the comet theory.
http://cosmictusk.com/
Actually spangles, I think comrade Luke was speaking tongue in cheek.
Looking back at the Vostok graph the Younger Dryas had relatively little impact on temperatures compared to Greenland.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Greenland_Gisp2_Temperature.svg
Luke thinks that 10,000 years of steady cooling is civilisation preventing an ice age with CO2.
About on par with his understanding of thermodynamic entropy.
But I suppose that when he claims that there is no cooling, you can't expect much better.
The boy is simply confused.
And are you also claiming the Eemian was not warmer than the Holocene?