THE Wall Street Journal states: “The public hates it.” The (UK) Telegraph calls the tax: “one of the most unsuccessful in history” and points out that it is “unique in that it generated virtually no revenue for the Australian Treasury due to its negative impact on productivity; contributed to the rising costs that have taken the gloss off the country’s resources boom; and essentially helped to bring down Ms Gillard’s former Government.” The Telegraph, in an article titled: “Australia abandons disastrous green tax on emissions,” adds that the tax failed in “winning over voters who faced higher costs passed on by the companies that had to pay for it.” In Slate, Ariel Bogel claims the 2011 bill required “about 350 companies to pay a penalty for their greenhouse gas emissions.”
I'm quoting from an article by Marita Noon, Executive Director of Energy Makes America Great, inc. just published online by RedState.
The article goes on to quote me on the need to now repeal the Renewable Energy Target and also gives something of a round-up in terms of where other countries are with such policies...
Marohasy says: “In short, repeal of the carbon tax is a big symbolic win. But it’s mostly just window-dressing: to appease the masses. In the background, proponents of anthropogenic global warming who dominate our political class still very much control the levers of government and intend to continue to terrorize the population with claims of catastrophic global warming, while consolidating their rent-seeking through the RET.” She explained: “Money collected from the carbon tax went to government, money collected through the RET largely goes to the global warming industry.”
While Australia is, as the Wall Street Journal put it: “the world’s first developed nation to repeal carbon laws that put a price on greenhouse-gas emissions,” it is not the only one to back away from such policies. New Zealand has weakened its emissions trading scheme; Japan has retreated from its pledges to cut greenhouse emissions and instead committed to a rise in emissions; Canada withdrew from the Kyoto protocol in 2011; England, where “the bill for green policies is rising,” has “so far resisted calls to expand tax on carbon emissions”; the European Union carbon emissions trading scheme—the biggest in the world and the heart of Europe’s climate-change program—is in dire straits; and, just the day after Australia’s news was announced, South Korea—whose planned 2015 emissions trading market launch would make it the world’s second largest—hinted at an additional delay due to projected costs to businesses.
Read the entire article here or at least go and 'like' it.
"Earth Hour - sixty minutes of forced piety"
Thanks again Robert.
NOAA: 28,504 Low Max Records Set in U.S. in Last 365 Days
http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/07/24/noaa-28504-low-max-records-set-in-u-s-in-last-365-days/
And the Yanks dont have a tax, or did the Oz tax cool the US climate?
You are most welcome, RLP. I've never doubted that you need cheering up.
I used to live near a coal loader on Sydney Harbour. The glossy appearance and Lapsand Souchong smell when they used to wet down the piles were heavenly. Coal is chocolate sunshine, after all. God's liquorice.
I'll burn a light of gratitude during Earth Hour, and feel sorry for all the angry, unhappy, carping puritans pretending to do without what they can never do without - except for those sixty minutes of forced piety.
"Toby says:
He never responds to anything, usually 1 comment per post in which he makes a fool of himself…perhaps that is why he then avoids commenting."
Well here I am back again and the reason I look in of this forum from time to time, is to see what the lunatic fringe is up to.
When you see
"And we still have hopes that Tony will use Direct Action to modernise our coal power gen. Lovely stuff, coal."
You know that this the far side.
But keep it up guys, I come here for a laugh when I need a cheer up.
RPL claims that the carbon tax has actually reduced carbon in the short time it has been in operation.
Leaving aside that it is actually CO2 that attracted the tax (not carbon). . . I would like to see RPL's evidence that it has been reduced.
As far as I am aware. . .CO2 has continued to rise locally & globally. . .didn't we recently tip over the 400ppm level?
As Robert & indeed Marita Noon points out. . .the tax did not deliver good results. . . and neither did it reduce CO2.