• Home
  • /
  • Blog
  • /
  • Opera House Still Above Sea Level: Despite Homogenisation
Humour Information

Opera House Still Above Sea Level: Despite Homogenisation

By jennifer
October 5, 2014
Opera House Still Above Sea Level: Despite Homogenisation

ONE of the longest continuous sea level measuring gauges is not far from the Sydney Opera House at Fort Denison. The mean sea level trend is 0.65 millimetres per year based on monthly sea level data from 1886 to 2010.

Except that sea levels haven’t trended consistently up each year but rather follow 50-60 year cycles, then there is the impact from El Nino events, and of course the moon is responsible for the neap tides and the king tides.

To be clear, that is NOT 0.65 centimetres per year, but rather MILLImetres per year. Tiny. Particularly given much of the New South Wales coastline has sustained an approximate 2 metre drop in sea levels over the last few thousand years. Not a 2 centimetre drop, but a 2 metre drop. This is not controversial, but rather a well-established fact in the technical literature. The arguing is not that the fall has been of this approximate magnitude, but whether the approximate 2 metre fall in sea levels has been more-or-less continuous or through step changes.

In the scheme of things the rise since 1886 is but a blip in an otherwise falling trend. Of course go back just 16,000 years and sea levels were rising, and significantly faster than at present. Yes. The climate changes.

But, what about Tuvulu, I hear someone ask? It’s an atoll in the Pacific that is sinking. Add to this pressure from a growing population resulting in the depletion of aquifers, and saltwater intrusion can give the false impression of sea level rise.

But none of this is new information to readers of this blog. What is new, is that Bob Carter and colleagues have just written a long report pointing out that there are wide variations in rates of tectonic uplift and subsidence (sinking) around the world at particular times and that any coastal management plan for New South Wales should be based on a good understanding of the local geology, as well as long-term rates of sea level rise. Professor Carter’s new report also suggests that in order to create an impression of sea level rise, rather than just plot raw data, there is a good amount of homogenization. In particular, the high sea-level rise figure of 3.3 mm per year reported for the Fort Denison tide gauge in the report does not represent the original data measurements, but results from computer modeling combined with the selection of a short and atypical section of the available sea-level record.

All this as rebuttal to what might appear to be an innocuous report by Whitehouse and Associates entitled ‘South Coast Regional Sea Level Rise Policy and Planning Framework’. But apparently it could become something of a blue print for the further erosion of the property rights of coastal residents more generally.

Bottom-line: we are unlikely to lose the South Coast or the Opera House to sea level rise from climate change, but it doesn’t hurt to have your own plan in case of a tsunami. According to Ted Bryant, recently retired from the University of Wollongong, six big tsunamis have hit Sydney during the last 10,000 years, the most recent in 1491.

I’m adding this youtube on a bad moon rising for fun.

Good Causes

Comments

  1. Thanks for that handjive. I've read Daly's piece before but not sure I have seen the original paper. Will reread both!

  2. A bit more info Re: Commander James Clark Ross for historical notes:

    In 1839, distinguished naval officer and polar explorer James Clark Ross (1800–1862) set off on an expedition to the Southern Ocean with two ships, HMS Erebus and HMS Terror.

    In April 1842, he stopped at Port Louis, (Falkland Is.) primarily to make magnetic field and other measurements, but also to make repairs to his ships which had been badly damaged in the Drake Passage.

    Having set up a winter base, he took the opportunity to make careful measurements of sea level relative to two benchmarks cut into the cliffs and marked with brass plaques.

    These marks remain in good condition to this day.

    This fact, along with the apparent good quality of Ross’s data, has allowed Woodworth’s team to compare the sea level records from 1842 with measurements taken at Port Louis using modern instruments in 1981–1982, 1984 and 2009.

    They also used information from nearby Port Stanley, where a permanent tide gauge was operated in the 1960s and 1970s and where NOC has had an operational gauge since 1992.

    After correction for air pressure effects and vertical land movement due to geological processes, the researchers find that sea levels rose by an average of around 0.75 millimetres a year between 1842 and the early 1980s.

    They point out that this figure is similar to previous estimates for the long-term rate of sea-level rise at Port Arthurin Tasmania, measurements with which Ross was also associated, and at other locations in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres.

    However, they also find evidence that the rate of sea-level rise has accelerated over recent decades.
    Specifically, they estimate that sea levels around the Falkland Islands have risen by an average of around 2.5 millimetres a year since 1992, a figure consistent with measurements made by satellite radar altimeters over the same period.

    http://noc.ac.uk/news/measuring-sea-level-rise-falklands

  3. Here is an update & comparison:

    Oct 13, 2014, the Conversation:
    CSIRO
    15 years from now, our impact on regional sea level will be clear
    "Human activity is driving sea levels higher. Australia’s seas are likely to rise by around 70 centimetres by 2100 if nothing is done to combat climate change.

    When averaged around the globe, sea level has been rising at a rate of about 1.7 millimetres per year between 1901 and 2010, and about 3.2 millimetres per year between 1993 and 2014."

    https://theconversation.com/15-years-from-now-our-impact-on-regional-sea-level-will-be-clear-31821
    * * *
    The Lempriere-Ross mark, CSIRO, 2001/2002:
    Global predictions are for the rate of change to increase, such that by 2100 sea-level will be between 9 and 88 cm above the 1990 global average sea-level.

    For the periods 1990 to 2025 and 1990 to 2050, the projected rises are 3 to 14 cm and 5 to 32 cm respectively (Houghton & Ding 2001).

    Already the Port Arthur benchmark is showing a rise in sea-levels of at least 13 cm since 1841, with an average annual rate of 0.8-1.0 mm/year (Pugh, Coleman & Hunter 2002).

    http://soer.justice.tas.gov.au/2003/casestudy/4/index.php

  4. RichardC, what point are you making with the OHC and MSL charts? I thought you were suggesting a lack of correspondence between OHC and MSL trends, but the charts you show point to exactly that? Do I misunderstand?

  5. By the way, it is ironic that a site defending so-called global warming would be named "The Conversation" when it does not permit any comments.
    But ironic confessions against interest are standard fare for climate obsessed fanatics.

  6. handjive,
    The only people committing fraud are those seeking to confuse a dubious claim about Australia with their conclusion about the entire globe, while denying the pause and missing heat problem at the same time.
    The BOM has forgotten the first rule of holes, apparently.

  7. The missing heat has gone missing from Antarctica, because global temperature rise made it go away. (Somewhere)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2784196/Sea-ice-surrounding-Antarctica-reaches-record-levels-hits-20-MILLION-square-kilometers.html

    Simple really, only a "denier" would argue that it is icier because it is colder. A climertolergist would know, that because a computer says it is warming, that the heat, mischievous stuff, is hiding somewhere.
    Can I get a grant from some Uni to go sit on the Great Barrier Reef and look for it ?

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *