I was born in Darwin, and raised in the Tropics, knowing the sound of monsoon rains on a tin roof – so loud, like a heard of buffalo galloping overhead. Always wondering, as I lay in bed when it would end, whether it would flood.
Caused by deep convection this is also how the Earth cools: driving energy from the Earth-ocean surface where it has accumulated to the upper atmosphere where it can be radiated to space as infra-red emissions. That is also the water cycle, and of course, water vapour is a greenhouse gas. Quite a bit was let off recently with cyclone Jasper and all the flooding.
The rainfall record for Kuranda is more than 120 year long, providing more than 4 weather cycles of information on rainfall in the catchment draining to Cairns, that recently suffered such terrible flooding. Especially the northern beaches, home to both family and friends. I phoned my sister to offer commiserations, and of course, she had to add that it was all so ‘unprecedented – the rainfall’, she added.
I thought I would wait until the rainfall totals were in before making comment. And so it is with this new year that we have the rainfall totals for Kuranda, the longest records that I know of for that catchment, for the Barron River catchment.
Kuranda is a mountain village above Cairns – beside the headwaters of the Barron River. It's known for the Kuranda Scenic Railway, which winds its way down to Cairns through tropic rainforest dotted with spectacular palm trees growing aside waterfalls that vary from a trickle to a torrent depending, of course, on the rainfall.
As the story goes 1882 was another unprecedented year of heavy rain. It cut the supply routes from the mining towns beyond the mountains to the coastal settlements including Cairns. Legendary bushman Christie Palmerston was tasked to find a reliable supply route for a railway to link the rich mining area to the sea. And so, the Kuranda railway was built opening in 1891, and with an official Australian Bureau of Meteorology rainfall record from 1896.
This record does not extend back to 1882, but we can see that 1911 is the wettest year on record with nearly 5,000 millimeters (4,921) of rain, followed by 1979 (4,657) and most recently, over this last year nearly 4,500 mm fell (4,417). It is the case that this December 2023 is the wettest December on record, but 2023 is not the wettest year on record. The heaviest rains in 1979 fell in January, and in 1911 it was in April.



It is unfortunate that there is no continuous temperature record for Kuranda, in fact temperatures have never been measured at Kuranda, at least not by the Bureau. They were measured at the Cairns post office from 1890 to 1952, and of course, this record shows cooling of maximum temperatures from 1920 to 1940, as do maximum temperature records from around the world.

Yet, curiously, climate change catastrophists and leading sceptics alike tend to deny this cooling and go on and on, variously about the one degree C increase in temperatures through the twentieth century.
They also like to claim that it is impossible to forecast rainfall, even my colleagues at the IPA. Of course, if you strip every historical temperature record of all meaningful cycles (particularly the cooling from 1920 to 1940) then reliable rainfall forecasting does become impossible.
To be continued.

https://postimg.cc/hQtZwPHL
Blep dishonesty does not help to hide BoM deletion of the entire hot year 1935 from the annual values. Rather you have helped to expose that a whole hot year has been deleted or 365 points from your trend calculation. To quote you "for years with complete data". The missing month of January 1935 and one more from the hot year that you tried to pretend is just three days, enable for dubious reasons the removal by the BoM of a whole hot year from annual totals and your Innisfail trend calculation. Your dodging and weaving here smell like the infamous email "At 06:25 28/09/2009, Tom Wigley wrote:"
But it's not about you it is about dodgy BoM data. Look at this hot year map before having more delusions of granduer like calling it the 1940s Blep instead of "1940s blip".
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/temp/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=maxanom&year=1935&month=12&day=31&period=12month&area=qd
After repairing it remember always ask, why the blip?
Yes Siliggy, there have been a number of days when the weather at Innisfail was very hot. The trend line I presented looked at climate averages. You do realise that weather and climate are different things? And a climate trend is something different again. If you were a trained scientist you might understand this. The slope of the line I presented was averaged across about 30,000 mean maximum temperatures for Innisfail. But you present three pieces of data from a scan of a vague old newspaper article! Really? The world has moved on. And yet you and Peter Etherington-Smith disparage my extensive research and academic expertise?! Cherry-picking data to support pre-existing conclusions is not scientifically valid. My advice to you is to "follow the money".
Oh so sorry Blep. Did not expect your inability to convert would prevent you from explaining why so many temperatures higher than the BoM's claimed record of 41 degrees C at site number 032025 were recorded from that site by other organisations. I had no intention of picking on the disabled. Just for you, an easier question. With all the BoM records that remain from that area showing between 1 and 4 degrees positive anomaly for the month of January 1935, why is the hot month missing from the Innisfail BoM record and your trend calculation? Oh and the map input no doubt.
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/temp/archive.jsp?colour=colour&map=maxanom&year=1935&month=1&period=month&area=qd
Siliggy... degrees F? ... Is that the dated measurement system used by Myanmar, Liberia and the USA? Most of the world has moved on.
A little more info to help you with that Blep.
The long BoM temperature record from Innisfail Queensland, 032025 has only monthly values from 1908 to 1956. The daily values go up until 2020. A newer "Aero" site, 032197 has daily values from June 2016. As is a little too usual the newer site produced higher maximum readings during the overlap period. The highest daily temperature in degrees C reported from either it is 42.3. That equates to 108.1 degrees F. Also in November 2018 but not the same day. At that site it was on the 27th.