• Home
  • /
  • Blog
  • /
  • Coral Bleaching. What They Don’t Tell You
Information

Coral Bleaching. What They Don’t Tell You

By jennifer
April 28, 2024
Coral Bleaching. What They Don’t Tell You

There was significant coral bleaching this last summer.   It was remarkable at the Keppel Islands.  But because scientists have been falsely calling it every year, this important fact is likely to be lost to our collective memory.  It is also a problem when my colleagues deny this bleaching.

If we deny when there is bleaching, and claim bleaching when there is none – it is impossible to know the cycles and their causes.

Last Sunday morning, at Secret Cove, I watched the turtle come out from under a stand of stark white coral – bleached coral – and swim towards me.

We swam together for a short while.  It looked across at me. I held its gaze.  It propelled itself gracefully forward with its fore flippers.

I tried to keep up.

Then the turtle veered off, in a different direction – away from me, and towards more stark white bleached coral.

The turtle that I swam beside at Secret Cover, last Sunday.

The turtle was not bothered by me and seemed oblivious to all the coral bleaching.

The creatures under-the-water last Sunday morning, they seem oblivious to the colour of the coral that was mostly stark white, some healthy chocolate brown (replete with symbiotic zooxanthellae/good microalgae), and some brown from infestations of macro algae smothering the corals.

To my eye, the fish and other creatures seemed randomly distributed, which is to say they could be found across the reef irrespective of the colour of the coral.

It was not at all how the BBC have described coral bleaching at the Great Barrier Reef – they have recently been using the terms ‘ghostly white’, ‘spooky white’, ‘like a graveyard’.   These journalists are clueless (CLICK HERE).

Secret Cove a week ago was badly bleached – and it was teeming with life.   But to know this, it is necessary to get under the water.

A big shout out to Jenn and the rest of the crew at Keppel Dive on Great Keppel Island (CLICK HERE). Thank you for the opportunity to dive so many coral reefs last weekend – thank you for your care and for finding the Epaulette shark at Secret Cove.

Trying for a selfie, with my Olympus TG6 at Secret Cove. This was Friday before last, from the little boat.

To know that many of the stark white corals are still alive it is necessary to observe them up close.   For example, the brain coral (perhaps a Lobophyllia sp. or Caulastrea sp.) did look ‘ghostly white’ from a few metres away.   But up close – after I reset my camera to take a macro – you can see that the polyps are still very much intact, that the polyps have a carpet-like texture concealing separate corallites.

A close-up of the brain coral that looked stark white from a distance, certainly badly bleached but still very much alive.   My fingers as a reference for colour and size.  About 6 metres under the water.

We even found a Moray eel.  I only managed to photograph its head, after waiting.  Its long slender body hidden under the corals.

A Moray eel poking its head out from under the corals at Secret Cove last Sunday.

Secret Cove fringes Great Keppel Island, reportedly with some of the worst of the coral bleaching, considering the entire Great Barrier Reef this last summer.

The BBC also mentioned ocean acidification and high temperatures – unprecedented they claim.   Again, they are just making stuff up.

I’ve noticed that the journalists and the scientists, from all sides of the political divides, increasingly just add to the established narratives rather than checking the data, or even visiting a coral reef.   This makes me an outlier – relevant only because you are reading me.   (For sure the institutions and sometimes even my colleagues and even social media want me cancelled so be sure to subscribe at my website for weekly e-news: CLICK HERE)

It is the case that our oceans are not acidic, not at all.   I wrote about this in a chapter for ‘Climate Change, The Facts’ back in 2017 (CLICK HERE).

As for the water temperatures, this last summer was hot, but not exceptionally so.

I write this, not with reference to the wholly contrived coloured maps they show you on the nightly news often for the whole Earth and always showing continuous increase (as though there is never winter), but rather with reference to more reliable location specific temperature data for the Keppel Islands.   For example, considering Australian Institute of Marine Science data for Square Rocks, and Bureau of Meteorology data for Rosslyn Bay, we can see that there is still a strong seasonal component to the temperature data and that this last summer temperatures were well within the expected seasonal cycle.

So, what caused the coral bleaching this last summer that has been so severe, particularly at the southern Great Barrier Reef, and particularly at the Keppel Islands?

The Moon has a particular influence on sea levels.

We see this not just in the daily and monthly cycles, but the Moon also causes the less well understood 18.6-year declination cycle.

The Moon takes a month to complete a revolution around the Earth. But it doesn't follow the same path, moving above the Earth's equator for two weeks and below the equator for two weeks of each month.  The distance above and below the equator changes with this 18.6 year cycle.  This is because as the Earth is tilted at 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun causing the seasons, the Moon is tilted at 5 degrees relative to the Earth, and every 18.6 years, the angle between the Moon's orbit and Earth's equator reaches a maximum that is the sum of Earth's equatorial tilt (23°27′) and the Moon's orbital inclination (5°09′) to the ecliptic. This is called major lunar standstill, and I define it as occurring when the distance that the Moon travels south is more than 28 degrees south each month.

While we may intuitively expect larger sea tides as the Moon approaches its maximum declination considering this 18.6-year cycle, because the gravitational forcing of the Moon is less well aligned with the gravitational forcing of the Sun on the Earth at this time, we see on average lower sea tides at least in the data for the nearby Rosslyn Bay gauge for the last few months.

I suspect that the bleaching at the Keppel Islands this last summer can be blamed on the Moon; specifically that the lower tides caused by Maximum Lunar Declination combined with a short period of clear skies and no winds caused the water to stay continuously warm for a longer period than usual, in a way that was catastrophic.

That is my hypothesis.

The popular claim, the consensus claim consistent with anthropogenic global warming theory that the atmosphere replete with greenhouse gases has been warming the ocean is not credible, at least not considering the location specific data for Square Rocks between North Keppel Island and Great Keppel Island.  The available Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) data shows that the water is consistently warmer than the air above it.   As the water is consistently warmer than the air, it is not logical to suggest that the air is warming the water.

Green is water, blue is air. Scroll to a version of this chart a little higher in this post complete with legend.

 

Under the water at Secret Cove, last Sunday morning.

*** Notes/Key References

Dr Alison Jones has been monitoring coral cover across reef flats and slopes in the Keppel Islands for some years. If this work continues, we could know the extent of the recovery in numbers – measured.   More information here:  Jones & Berkelmans.  Keppel Islands reefs: Baseline study 2008-2010.  CLICK HERE.

There was significant reporting of coral bleaching at the Keppel Islands in 2006, corresponding with the last maximum lunar declination; more information here: Great Barrier Reef coral bleaching surveys 2006. GBRMPA Research Publication No. 87 CLICK HERE.

The shark, under the water at Secret Cove last Sunday morning.

Understanding Lunar Declination ...

Today, the Earth's axis is tilted 23.5 degrees from the plane of its orbit around the sun. But this tilt changes. During a cycle that averages about 40,000 years, the tilt of the axis varies between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees. Because this tilt changes, the seasons as we know them can become exaggerated.

Every 18.6 years, the angle between the Moon's orbit and Earth's equator reaches a maximum of 28°36′, the sum of Earth's equatorial tilt (23°27′) and the Moon's orbital inclination (5°09′) to the ecliptic. This is called major lunar standstill. Around this time, the Moon's declination will vary from −28°36′ to +28°36′.

“Because of the inclination of the Moon's orbit with respect to the Earth's equator, the Moon is above the horizon at the North and South Pole for almost two weeks every month, even though the Sun is below the horizon for six months at a time. The period from moonrise to moonrise at the poles is a tropical month, about 27.3 days, quite close to the sidereal period. When the Sun is the furthest below the horizon (winter solstice), the Moon will be full when it is at its highest point. When the Moon is in Gemini it will be above the horizon at the North Pole, and when it is in Sagittarius it will be up at the South Pole.   Quoting from Wikipedia, CLICK HERE .

Stingrays; so many, last Sunday at Secret Cove.

Teeming with life, last Sunday at Secret Cove. And this photograph is for my Facebook friend Dave Ross.  He always remembers the many names for this fish that is so common at the Keppel Islands.

Good Causes

Comments

  1. BoM does not remodel data, it homogenises data in an internationally approved process.

    "Anyone who thinks they have found fault with the Bureau’s methods should document them thoroughly and reproducibly in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. This allows others to test, evaluate, find errors or produce new methods.

    This process has been the basis of all scientific advances in the past couple of centuries and has led to profoundly important advances in knowledge. Abandoning peer-reviewed journals in favour of newspaper articles when adjudicating on scientific methods would be profoundly misguided."

    https://theconversation.com/no-the-bureau-of-meteorology-is-not-fiddling-its-weather-data-31009

  2. ... "infilled (using regression and/or an artificial neural network), to better estimate the likely temperature history"...

    Reads like homogenisation to me.

  3. Thanks Alison and Steve

    It is useful to consider full cycle lengths. So 18.6 years when we are considering lunar declination, and perhaps more than the last few decades if we are considering medium term trends.

    It is possible to go back more than 100 years with the instrumental records as I show in this blog post from some years ago, https://climatelab.com.au/2019/08/lady-elliot-just-a-hot-flush/

    Considering the longer temperature record (unhomogenized, that is before the Bureau remodel it) there was cooling to about 1960. And if you skip across to the link you will also find this:

    "Considering the longer records within the 300 km radius (of Lady Elliott Island), maximum temperatures have sometimes fluctuated by more than 2°C within a few years. This is evident from the detail in the individual series in Figure 3. The more than 2°C variation in temperatures as measured at Gayndah between 1900 and 1904, for example, is more than the overall warming trend at Lady Elliot of 1.95°C per hundred years since 1940.

    Maximum temperatures for Gayndah and Bundaberg spiked in 1915, as they did for all the other stations recording within a 300 km radius of Lady Elliot Island at that time.

    So, we can perhaps assume it was also a relatively hot year at Lady Elliot Island … back in 1915. Perhaps it was as hot back then as it is now, which is quite hot considering the longer records. Then again the spike may have been a consequence of the land drought, and places like Sandy Cape Lighthouse and Lady Elliott less affected. There is no mean annual maximum value for Sandy Cape Light House (number 39085) for 1915 because of missing values … but these could be infilled (using regression and/or an artificial neural network), to better estimate the likely temperature history for this region over land and also sea. Ends.

  4. Barbara Sheppard, I am enjoying the frantic “explanations” from Jennifer to explain the coral bleaching that was widely predicted by the scientific community months ago. Whilst I am not a climate expert, I understand there are many complex drivers of climate, and it seems to me that those who choose to focus on CO2, are supported by the fossil fuel industry. And of course, Jen's hastily prepared "hypothesis" will not be dismissed by her followers. Now I am off to read about the record global temperatures last month (again).

  5. You can't dispute facts:
    https://www.aims.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-04/FINAL-Aerial%20Bleaching%20GBR2024Report_AIMS_Final_15Apr2024.pdf

    Thermal stress started building in late December through January and again in late February until the middle of March, throughout all three regions of the GBR. Reef waters accumulated heat stress throughout the summer, as maximum Degree Heating Weeks (DHWs) were reached on the 8th and 15th of March 2024 in the Southern and Central GBR and the 21st of March 2024 in the Northern GBR. The most intense and prolonged heat stress occurred at inshore reefs in the Southern GBR, with heat stress exposure peaking at 2.3-2.5°C above historical summer maxima and leading to an accumulation of heat stress up to 12.0 - 15.5°C-weeks (DHWs; estimated by the US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) NOAA Coral
    Reef Watch Daily 5km Satellite Coral Bleaching Heat Stress Degree Heating Week Product (Version 3.1)) at surveyed reefs, reaching the highest levels to date in the satellite record on the GBR.
    This prolonged heat exposure has caused mass bleaching of coral reef communities observed within all three regions of the Great Barrier Reef. The combination of aerial (Images 1-4) and in-water surveys in 2024 confirm a mass bleaching event, with prevalent and extreme bleaching observed at multiple reefs in all 3 regions of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.
    This is the fifth mass bleaching event to occur since 2016 and the seventh mass bleaching event on the GBR since 1998.
    Aerial surveys are a crucial tool to assess the prevalence and spatial extent of coral bleaching across the large GBR ecosystem and were conducted in 2024 by trained observers from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and the Australian Institute of Marine Science from both helicopter and fixed-wing airplanes.
    In 2024, 75% of the reefs surveyed during the aerial surveys across the entire Reef experienced heat stress capable of causing coral bleaching (>4°C-weeks to 8°C-weeks) in 2024. The spatial footprint and intensity of thermal stress is increasing across the GBR, with 46% of reefs
    exposed to the highest maximum DHW level ever experienced during the 2024 summer, predominantly in the Southern and Central GBR. In 2016 and 2017, these records occurred on less than 20% of reefs in the Central and Northern GBR.

Write a Comment