They don’t like us – by which I mean they don’t like most people, but they especially don’t like women. If you want to know the type in some detail, consider reading ‘Wifedom – Mrs Orwell’s Invisible Life’ by Anna Funder.
For sure, they won’t come out and tell you. Rather they know how to use you. They like to be served. Indeed, they are likely to need you to write their book, and then organise the book launch. The book could even be about nature, but they don’t want to ever have to interface with it. They need to be in control.
These same people are motivated by power and do not fundamentally believe in equality. For sure, they are quietly pleased to see the women crying in the boxing ring in Paris at the Olympics – beaten up by the other men. For them, this is evidence that women cannot fundamentally compete with men – that they should stay in the kitchen, or at least in a subservient role.
They will tell you that there are monsters under the sea, meanwhile they create havoc on land.
Last week, some of the media reported how two boxers banned from competing by the International Boxing Association (IBA), Algerian Imaine Khelif and Taiwanese Lin Yu-ting, brutalised their female opponent at the 2024 Olympics in Paris; hitting them so hard that they quit their matches. These are biological males who are allowed to compete because they are ‘women according to their passports’.
It is all written in black and white, at the media page for the Olympics, CLICK HERE, same following:
Every person has the right to practise sport without discrimination.
All athletes participating in the boxing tournament of the Olympic Games Paris 2024 comply with the competition’s eligibility and entry regulations, as well as all applicable medical regulations set by the Paris 2024 Boxing Unit (PBU) (please find all applicable rules here). As with previous Olympic boxing competitions, the gender and age of the athletes are based on their passport.
These rules also applied during the qualification period, including the boxing tournaments of the 2023 European Games, Asian Games, Pan American Games and Pacific Games, the ad hoc 2023 African qualifying tournament in Dakar (SEN) and two world qualifying tournaments held in Busto Arsizio (ITA) and Bangkok (THA) in 2024, which involved a total of 1,471 different boxers from 172 National Olympic Committees (NOCs), the Boxing Refugee Team and Individual Neutral Athletes, and featured over 2,000 qualification bouts.
The PBU used the Tokyo 2020 boxing rules as a baseline to develop its regulations for Paris 2024. This was to minimise the impact on athletes’ preparations and guarantee consistency between Olympic Games. These Tokyo 2020 rules were based on the post-Rio 2016 rules, which were in place before the suspension of the boxing International Federation by the IOC in 2019 and the subsequent withdrawal of its recognition in 2023.
We have seen in reports misleading information about two female athletes competing at the Olympic Games Paris 2024. The two athletes have been competing in international boxing competitions for many years in the women’s category, including the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020, International Boxing Association (IBA) World Championships and IBA-sanctioned tournaments.
These two athletes were the victims of a sudden and arbitrary decision by the IBA. Towards the end of the IBA World Championships in 2023, they were suddenly disqualified without any due process.
According to the IBA minutes available on their website, this decision was initially taken solely by the IBA Secretary General and CEO. The IBA Board only ratified it afterwards and only subsequently requested that a procedure to follow in similar cases in the future be established and reflected in the IBA Regulations. The minutes also say that the IBA should “establish a clear procedure on gender testing”.
The current aggression against these two athletes is based entirely on this arbitrary decision, which was taken without any proper procedure – especially considering that these athletes had been competing in top-level competition for many years.
Such an approach is contrary to good governance.
Eligibility rules should not be changed during ongoing competition, and any rule change must follow appropriate processes and should be based on scientific evidence.
The IOC is committed to protecting the human rights of all athletes participating in the Olympic Games as per the Olympic Charter, the IOC Code of Ethics and the IOC Strategic Framework on Human Rights. The IOC is saddened by the abuse that the two athletes are currently receiving.
The IBA’s recognition was withdrawn by the IOC in 2023 following its suspension in 2019. The withdrawal of recognition was confirmed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). See the IOC’s statement following the ruling.
The IOC has made it clear that it needs National Boxing Federations to reach a consensus around a new International Federation in order for boxing to be included on the sports programme of the Olympic Games LA28. Ends.
For sure, across the world there are men in power who enjoy humiliating women. I've witnessed it my entire career as a scientist. They will always find a way, unless we learn how to fight back in ways that are intelligent. My father always warned me to never get in the ring with them, and that the pen is more powerful than the sword. There are other ways.
These men who are demanding women box with men in Paris, are the same men who would have us all compulsorily vaccinated against whatever they wanted, and they are also the same men who would ban tourism at the Great Barrier Reef – if only they could. Because they fundamentally don't want us to connect with who we are – they are the real monsters and they have always lived amongst us, on land.
And they support the bizarre meme that is mostly making them a lot of money because it is forcing an energy transition – they laugh as they see children frightened that the world is overheating.
For sure, the world is not as it seems. If you needed any proof of this just read about the fiasco that is the Paris Olympics – from the opening ceremony to the boxing ring. And the British and European royals are there, as always, cheering it all on.
Peter Etherington-Smith, speaking of ignorance, you are the only one talking about surgeries.
Jennifer is absolutely right to be concerned and could do without ignorant comments.
For those who think that gender reassignment and other abuses of children is just a game I suggest you search for a recent report "The WPATH Files - pseudoscientific surgical and hormonal experiments on children, adolescents and young adults
by Mia Hughes. 5 March 2024". This is a report compiled from a leaked video and text exchanges between medical practitioners belonging to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. WPATH is quoted as the leading authority on gender medicine in the world with considerable influence throughout the Anglo-sphere including in the UK via the NHS.
In a recent interview with Michael Shellenberg and Ms Hughes it was explained that these leaked materials have revealed that leading medical practitioners in the field of gender paediatric health care are all too aware that many of these procedures are experimental and most significantly, that they have been proceeding with irreversible surgery on patients who cannot possibly give informed consent, either because they are too young or that they suffer from some other psychological disorder.
The leaked discussions include doing potential surgeries and administering drugs for children including as young as 10, delaying their development, on people diagnosed as schizophrenic disorders, identity disorders and so on. People within WPATH, inside what is called Gender Affirming Medicine are reported to explicitly recognise that neither the children nor the parents (in some cases not even included in discussions) understand the consequences of these procedures that are experimental and which include life long sterilisation, and loss of sexual function. So this is extremely serious, competing with past medical scandals such as the infected blood for haemophiliacs and others. It is child abuse pure and simple, in fact it is abuse of anyone who is fed untruthful information about the consequences which often involve life-long pain and an inability to rectify the terrible mistake that was made. This is medical malpractice that contravenes the Hippocratic oath of 'do no harm'.
The NHS is now offering surgery to these abused unfortunates, some of whom may be so desperately unhappy as to be contemplating suicide (and some have already taken this final step) to return to their original biological sex, even though it can only be a partial return. Some critical functions can never be restored.
You are free to make up your own minds about this report, but it is not the only one with similar examples of medical malpractice for which there is more and more evidence. Lack of informed consent is critical here and it is something lacking in many other situations which come under criminal law - though not all unfortunately.
Almost all children and teenagers go through periods of uncertainty, self-doubt etc., and most grow out of it. They do not need irrevocable surgery, just thoughtful understanding and a confidence boost. So please lets get real about this threat and stop the nonsense about fishes and anything goes.