Hello Jennifer,
My paper, “Rhodes Fairbridge and the idea that the solar system regulates the earth’s climate”** has now been published.
Here is the link:
http://www.griffith.edu.au/conference/ics2007/pdf/ICS176.pdf
I would be most grateful if you would post it on your website. I am sure it will be of interest to your readers.
As is usual for a high quality international scientific journal, my article was subject to a vigorous peer review process, to which I had to respond before the reviewers and the editors would agree to publish it. This having been done, the paper has now been published.
Yours sincerely
Richard Mackey
---------------------------------------
Here is the abstract:
Rhodes Fairbridge died on 8th November, 2006. He was one of Australia’s most accomplished scientists and has
a special connection with Australia. In July, 1912 his father Kingsley established Fairbridge Village near Perth.
It contains a chapel of elegant simplicity designed by one of the world’s most famous architects of the time, Sir
Herbert Baker, as a labour of love to commemorate Kingsley. Rhodes is one of the few scientists to research the
sun/climate relationship in terms of the totality of the sun’s impact on the earth (i.e. gravity, the electromagnetic
force and output and their interaction). When the totality of the sun’s impact is considered, having regard to the
relevant research published over the last two decades, the influence of solar variability on the earth’s climate is
very strongly non-linear and stochastic. Rhodes also researched the idea that the planets might have a role in
producing the sun’s variable activity. If they do and if the sun’s variable activity regulates climate, then ultimately the planets may regulate it. Recent research about the sun/climate relationship and the solar inertial motion (sim) hypothesis shows a large body of circumstantial evidence and several working hypotheses but no satisfactory account of a physical sim process. In 2007 Ulysses will send information about the solar poles. This could be decisive regarding the predictions about emergent Sunspot Cycle No 24, including the sim hypothesis.
According to the sim hypothesis, this cycle should be like Sunspot Cycle No 14, and be followed by two that will
create a brief ice age. During the 1920s and ‘30s Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology published research about
the sun/climate relationship, especially Sunspot Cycle No 14, showing that it probably caused the worst drought
then on record.
And an extract from the paper:
"The earth’s atmosphere contains several major oscillating wind currents that have a key role in the regulation of the earth’s weather and climate. These wind currents include the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO); Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO); the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO); the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO); the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO); the Atlantic Multdecadal Oscillation (AMO); the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD); and the Arctic Oscillation (AO); and the northern and southern polar vortices, which are two permanent cyclones at the poles. FAGAN (1999), (2000) and (2004) has shown how the climate changes rendered by these global atmospheric systems have resulted in major historic changes to cultures and societies throughout the world since the dawn of history.
LABITZKE et al. (2005), COUGHLIN and KUNG (2004) and CORDERO and NATHAN (2005) report that the sunspot cycle drives these large-scale oscillating wind currents. For example, strength of the QBO circulation and the length of the QBO period varies directly with the sunspot cycle. COUGHLIN and KUNG (2004) also conclude that at a range of atmospheric heights and at all latitudes over the planet, the atmosphere warms appreciably during the maximum of the sunspot cycle, and cools during the minimum of the cycle.xix VAN LOON, MEEHL AND ARBLASTER (2004) established that in the northern summer (July to August), the major climatological tropical precipation maxima are intensified in solar maxima compared with solar minima during the period 1979 to 2002.
NUGROHO and YATINI 2006 report that the sun strongly influences the IOD during wet season in the monsoons climate pattern; that is, the December to February period. CAMP and TUNG (2006) found that a significant relationship exists between polar warming and the sunspot cycle. ZAITSEVA et al. (2003) found that the intensity of the NAO depends on solar activity. ABARCA DEL RIO et al. (2003) have found that the patterns of variation between indices of solar activity, the Atmospheric Angular Momentum index and Length of Day show that variations in solar activity are a key driver of atmospheric dynamics. The United States Geological Survey agency found that changes in total solar radiant output cause changes in regional precipitation, including floods and droughts in the Mississippi River basin.xx The tropical oceans absorb varying amounts of solar radiant output, creating ocean temperature variations.
These are transported by major ocean currents to locations where the stored energy is released into the atmosphere. As a result, atmospheric pressure is altered and moisture patterns are formed that can ultimately affect regional precipitation.
SCAFETTA et al.(2004) and SCAFETTA and WEST (2005) have found that the earth’s temperature periodicities, particularly those of the oceans, inherit the structure of the periodicity of solar activity. WHITE et al. (1997) and REID (1991) have found that the sunspot cycle produces periodicities in the oceans’ temmperatures. This research shows that sea surface temperatures in the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic Oceans, whether taken separately or combined, follow measures of solar radiant output derived from satellite observations and the sunspot record.
The sun’s separate impacts on the atmosphere and the ocean, and the complex non-linear interaction between the atmosphere and the ocean, is another process that amplifies the non-linear impact of the sun on our climate. Given that solar activity is a key determinant of ocean temperature, the decline on solar activity measured over the last decade should give rise in due course to a cooling of the oceans.
Read the full paper here: http://www.griffith.edu.au/conference/ics2007/pdf/ICS176.pdf
** MACKEY, R., 2007. Rhodes Fairbridge and the idea that the solar system regulates the Earth’s climate. Journal
of Coastal Research, SI 50 (Proceedings of the 9th International Coastal Symposium), 955 – 968. Gold Coast,
Australia, ISSN 0749.0208
Louis
what is the mechanism that CO2 causes the 'negligable' warming of the earth by?
SJT,
Co2 has negligible effect on the earth's surface temperature.
There is no such thing as a greenhouse gas - water exists in the physical phase as suspended droplets of liquid and it is the physical presence of this suspended liquid phase that stops heat leaving the surface of the earth into space.
Just like a greenhouse.
So get the science right please.
Richard Mackey's paper reads more like an obituary. Too long, and no time to wade through it.
Hopefully the warming we've seen in Oz over the last 10 years is due to solar activity. The measurement data ( http://www.acrim.com/ ) shows that a warm phase of solar activity started in the mid-nineties. We should be cooling off from now.
I don't know which is worse for them. Why does it have to be unprecedented Davey? (Careful now...)
Luke,
Thanks for the Guardian reference. It shows a dam in Yorkshire nearly dry in summer 2003. Later it mentions 'serious flooding' in parts of Yorkshire, presumably this year. So is Yorkshire suffering drought or flood? Which is worse? Is either unprecedented in the records? (Careful now...)
Schiller
the simple fact of the matter is, CO2 is a greenhouse gas, it warms up the earth. Without it, the planet would be cooler than it is.
More of it warms up the earth, which is what is happening now. The only question is, to what extent do the feedback effects such as change in albedo leverage that warming.
NASA Finds Sun-Climate Connection in Old Nile Records
March 19, 2007
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/features.cfm?feature=1319
... a group of NASA and university scientists has found a convincing link between long-term solar and climate variability in a unique and unexpected source: directly measured ancient water level records of the Nile, Earth's longest river.
Alexander Ruzmaikin and Joan Feynman of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., together with Dr. Yuk Yung of the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif., have analyzed Egyptian records of annual Nile water levels collected between 622 and 1470 A.D. at Rawdah Island in Cairo. These records were then compared to another well-documented human record from the same time period: observations of the number of auroras reported per decade in the Northern Hemisphere. ---------
"Since the time of the pharaohs, the water levels of the Nile were accurately measured, since they were critically important for agriculture and the preservation of temples in Egypt," she said. "These records are highly accurate and were obtained directly, making them a rare and unique resource for climatologists to peer back in time." ...
Peace out Jim
SJT - You left something out:
The issue, what's changing? Currently, the sun AND TEMPERATURE isn't, but CO2 is.
SJT,
I can also correlate global warming with an upsurge in Leftist ideology. Do you want to buy that correlationist argument, too?
You and your buddies need to think about the notion of 'causation.' It might be rather antique in your world view, but you may well find it instructive if you comprehend it properly.
Schiller strikes back with a beaten up strawman. Luke didn't say that at all. The paper is a piece of interminable waffle that no serious journal would allow to soil it's pages.
The issue, what is changing? Currently, the sun isn't, but CO2 is.