Political Correctness: The front-runners for this year's Nobel Peace Prize are a couple of global warming alarmists. With dozens of wars raging, the committee couldn't find a single person laboring honorably for peace?
Once a symbol of distinction, this honor has plumbed shameful depths in recent years. A county fair blue ribbon has more significance. Since 1990, winners include terrorist Yasser Arafat, fraud Rigoberto Menchu, foreign-policy incompetents Jimmy Carter and Kofi Annan, unreconstructed communist Mikhail Gorbachev and the useless Mohamed ElBaradei.
Each year, the Peace Prize committee has a chance to redeem itself, yet it never seems up to the task. It looks like 2007 will be no exception. Later this week, say reports, it will name as this year's co-winners Al Gore and Sheila Watt-Cloutier, a Canadian who has drawn attention to what she believes are climate change's effects on Arctic communities.
It will be interesting to see how those two will be linked to anything resembling the promotion of peace.......
So you place the postulations of a scientific THEORY over the ruling of the BRITISH HIGH COURT, There is plenty of evidence against the so-called global warming, its just that the government/scientists/aethiests don't want you to find it.
In response to Al Gore's work I have an old Scottish proverb, "Anything is possible if you do not know what you are talking about".
Anon It is usually God provence.
About that court case in California, it was thrown out because the attorney general couldn't put a finger on any specific damages rendered by the automobile carbon emmissions.
He tried to claim lower rainfall. The judge wasn't having any of it.
Then he tried to use glacier melt. The judge said "So how much do glaciers cost?"
So C3PO's contention that "The court decided it was not the appropriate body to make decisions on matters of science." is not accurate.
Did you just make that up?
you're the apart of the reason why humans will die out as a species.
i bet you think only god can control the weather.