Protesting against AGW freaks is like protesting against big money backed by the Leftist press.
If you have Big Money and can suck in the Leftist (now right-wing, i.e., fascist) press, you have a 50-50 shot.
Good luck.
The U.N. wants to be a World Government and the press loves time-and-money-wasting institutions like that. Sort of like the Fourth Reich. The Left makes a Right turn and cleanses the Earth.
I don't care for the George Carlin of today, who is much cruder than in his early days. However, his skit on saving the planet is funny and to the point, and it flies in the face of the left-wingers who worship this guy for his anti-establishment ways.
Louis, thats old hat, most of those sceptics have backed out and shifted the debate. They've moved on to doubting if the $ spent on combating climate change is worth it. Another question altogether but you're hardly on solid ground to shreik the end of the consensus
Anthony
There is no consensus is science and as the global warming idea has soundly falsified, the next assault is on the money angle.
In any case are you the next iteration of Luke, who was the reincarnation of Phil Done?
Seems much like it judging by the comments though the lack of url's linking to chapters and verse of the litany is a welcome relief.
This is a stupid effort.
Protesting against AGW freaks is like protesting against big money backed by the Leftist press.
If you have Big Money and can suck in the Leftist (now right-wing, i.e., fascist) press, you have a 50-50 shot.
Good luck.
The U.N. wants to be a World Government and the press loves time-and-money-wasting institutions like that. Sort of like the Fourth Reich. The Left makes a Right turn and cleanses the Earth.
Gads.
I don't care for the George Carlin of today, who is much cruder than in his early days. However, his skit on saving the planet is funny and to the point, and it flies in the face of the left-wingers who worship this guy for his anti-establishment ways.
http://www.jibjab.com/view/122257
It was Blorn Lomborg who originally told us that it wasn't worth the money or effort.
Really Anthony, specifically, which ones?
Louis, thats old hat, most of those sceptics have backed out and shifted the debate. They've moved on to doubting if the $ spent on combating climate change is worth it. Another question altogether but you're hardly on solid ground to shreik the end of the consensus
I'll say - superb site! And there is supposed to be consensus about global warming?
Another excellent source is Philip Stott's new blog - has a good RSS feed.
Excellent!