ELEANOR HALL: Australian delegates to an international conference on global sustainability delivered a warning today that the earth is reaching a point where it's changing beyond our control. Almost 3,000 scientists have been in London for the conference to discuss the relatively new field of earth system science.
That’s how the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) began a story today on ‘The World Today’.
Want to really know what the conference is about and how qualified the scientists delivering the message about tipping points are?
Read ‘The Royal Society’s Blatherfest’ by Donna Laframboise here:
http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2012/03/24/the-royal-societys-blatherfest/
********
Donna Lafromboise is the author of ‘The Delinquent Teenager’ all about the IPCC and how unqualified its ‘experts’ are.
http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/my-book/
Well yes dopey draws - agriculture changes vast areas of albedo, surface roughness and evaporation - like a duh !
Of course humans can change climate. Check the clouds - a typical formation - http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/earth/14fenc.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Where - here http://media.wiley.com/wires/WCC/WCC144/nfig004.jpg - west of the fence is wheat for miles and miles
http://awsassets.wwf.org.au/img/wa_wheatbelt_public_land_map_800x600_4335.jpg
Are believers dim enough to actually think the Earth has changed within our control?
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=11329 Debs a binary test for sceptics - ROFL
So what's the definition of a warmist?
Actually this is apparently a 'sceptic' blog.
So a definition of that would be appreciated too.
That way I could figure out these ' verbal me/you' accusations 🙂
I'm not a warmist. Don't verbal me.
Okay. so it's satire! I'm being satirised as a flat earther and commie hater. (Half-right.)
Yet I can't help feeling that the original response to koalabear was some sort of major blunder, which is now to be covered up with much indirection and evasion.
What about it Luke? Was your original remark a blunder, or are you pretending it was some kind of barely comprehensible, heavily disguised satire directed at koalabear?
"They’re not getting rid of the Dept of Climate Change – doesn’t exist."
Are warmies always this wriggly? Is it always the dog that ate your homework?
Robert - look don't bluff me with your internet trickery - on here bigoted redneck opinions are much more important than evidence or science. Look a bloke down the pub said it was all bullshit and didn't exist. So do you want to believe the internet or the bloke down the pub. it doesn't exist.
Who do you know works there? The only thing that exists is GetUp and they employ actors.
So what happens Robert is you to make stuff up about people you don't know. Right ! That's how stupid sceptic blogs work.
Then you do a bit of verballing. A gish gallop gatling gun is always handy. Pick on a few celebs. Bit of cherry picking. Ignore the general and pick an obscure exception. The ol' commo world govt one is good if you run out of ideas too.
Well, Luke, you've got me. Maybe something wonderful has happened overnight and it doesn't exist. Maybe there's a trick here, and I'm missing it. But here goes:
http://www.climatechange.gov.au/
Top left, next to that emu.
Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. Combet's the minister.
Not a meaningless, manipulative factoid, like "The Arctic is melting" or "The planet is warming" or "Sea levels are rising". Just a fact.
What am I missing? What's the trick here? I'm genuinely intrigued.
Robert - it doesn't exist - prove it.
The Dept of Climate Change does not exist.
Nor is there a DEPT of anything, if full names are to be required.
We have a Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. (Mustn't neglect the lie of CAGW and forget the lie of Renewables.)
To advance any gigantic lie, you need statistics and factoids. Lately, something else called a model has been popular. Models make the distortion of statistics and factoids effortless.
A real advance!