The UK government on Tuesday backed the exploration of shale gas nearly one year after it temporarily banned the drilling method which triggered two earthquakes in Britain but that has also revolutionised the U.S. energy market. An expert report commissioned by the government said shale gas fracking, a process where pressurised water and chemicals are pumped underground to open shale rocks and release trapped gas, was safe to resume with tighter rules on seismic monitoring and drilling surveys. --Alessandra Prentice, Reuters, 17 April 2012
Lancashire is set to become the centre of Britain’s energy future, after regulators gave the green light for fracking to return. A report published today by the Department for Energy and Climate Change said that energy giant Cuadrilla Resources should be allowed to restart work at its drilling rig in the Lancashire countryside. --Lancashire Evening Post, 17 April 2012
Chris Huhne in particular is renowned for his uninhibited antagonism towards natural gas. At the Liberal Democrat party conference in Birmingham last week he promised to halt a new "dash for gas" because it would undermine the UK's unilateral climate targets. David Cameron would be well advised not to allow his green minister to squander Britain's golden shale gas opportunity. –Benny Peiser, Public Service Europe, 27 September 2011
Ministers have been advised to allow the controversial practice of fracking for shale gas to be extended in Britain, despite it causing two earthquakes and the emergence of serious doubts over the safety of the wells that have already been drilled. The advice of the first official British government report into fracking, published on Tuesday, is all but certain to be accepted by ministers, with the result that thousands of new wells could be drilled across the UK. Some groups – including The Global Warming Policy Foundation, the climate-sceptic thinktank led by Lord Lawson – have been enthusiastically advocating the take-up of the technology. But residents in the areas affected have been mobilising against the plans. --Fiona Harvey, The Guardian, 17 April 2012
Many of those who oppose fracking do so not on the basis of the evidence, but out of a more general hostility to fossil fuels. Yet shale gas is relatively clean, and far more secure than other supplies. Sadly, our enthusiasm (in contrast to the Americans’) has been distinctly half-hearted. --Editorial, The Daily Telegraph, 17 April 2012
Can the green lobby win the shale gas argument over environmental objections? I don’t think it can. Ten or 20 years ago it could have won when governments were willing to burn billions, but the economic climate has changed, we’re facing the biggest crisis in decades. No government in the world would give up this opportunity, not even the British government, which is very green indeed. I don’t think the Greens have a leg to stand on when it comes to shale. Shale shouldn’t have any big problem and in all likelihood the government will grasp it with both hands. I cannot foresee a situation where Europe will forgo this golden opportunity. --Benny Peiser, Natural Gas Europe, 25 October 2011
From the gwfp.org newsletter.
Subscribe at http://thegwpf.org
Cohenite,
'One of the most grotesque aspects of the gas controversy is Milne, Brown’s ‘Earthing’ replacement, saying she will stop the gas companies because the Greens are the farmers’ friend.'
I know this is unkind of me but I can't help it....
She bears a remarkable resemblance to Professor Umbrage in the Harry Potter movies both in appearance and mannerisms.
If you haven't seen it, this particular lady presents as sweet and friendly and on the surface she appears to love her new position as headmistress of the school and she appears to like students.
However....it unfolds that she secretly hates children and takes much pleasure in incessantly torturing them and using her position to do so.
I am rather appalled that farming rep groups would consider aligning with Ms Milne and her deputy A Bandt. A short trip through their speeches and also through the Green's policy statements reveals quite clearly that they are most certainly NOT the farmers' friend. 🙂
It is rather grotesque.
I do not know a great deal about the CSG debate. However, I am highly suspicious of the rhetoric that is developing around it....I am having a bad case of deja vouz.
Looks like I am going to have to do some research....sheesh!
John Sayers:
Thanks for that nugget and link John, it reinforces (what Kevlar does!) my argument. For years I assumed there must be some technical problem with using methane in reciprocating engines, which is why it wasn't being developed to any extent. I suspect there's a hidden agenda here. I wonder if we'll ever see the day when many filling stations have their own little well and storage tank?
I'll add a little to my previous comment; wastage during production equates to loss of pure profit, which is why companies spend much time and money minimising it. Reducing leakage, wastage, and faulty production reduces the cost per unit and maximises profit. They might be evil capitalists, but they're not stupid, perhaps even conservationists at heart.
The gas cylinder problem has been solved by the use of Kevlar cylinders as in the new Tata air powered Mini CAT.
http://www.themotorreport.com.au/53641/tata-mini-cat-air-powered-car-on-sale-from-mid-2012
these cylinders can hold up to 5,000psi and tear instead of exploding.