Dear Supporters,
In the next few days we will be launching a poster campaign to coincide with the introduction of the Carbon TAX.
The campaign will consist of distributing this poster http://www.galileomovement.com.au/images/poster_campaign_800c.jpg to shops and business in your local area and asking them to display it prominently in their windows or notice boards.
We have chosen this method of communication as we think it will reach more people than will a letter box drop and needs less effort.
We need your help in two ways:
Firstly, you can request us to send you by mail between 1-5 posters for you to take to your local shops. (More if you are really confident)
Additionally, you are welcome to download and print your own copies and ask businesses to hang them in their front windows.
And secondly, we are looking for 100 supporters to donate $5.00 each to help cover the costs of printing and postage. (All money donated will go towards this campaign only).
Link to our Donations Page http://www.galileomovement.com.au/donations.php
A special big thank you to Steve Hunter who has allowed us to use his illustration.
If you have any questions, or want to show your support or order posters, please email us at Galileomovement@gmail.com
Thank you for your support!
The Galileo Movement
Of course we need a carbon tax. How else do you expect all those travel expenses at the Department of Climate Change to be funded? How else will all those dubious limo expenses by Peter Slipper get paid? Who will pay for Craig Thompson's fun and games? Who will pay all those climate commissioners? Of course we need a carbon tax. Or else throw out the lot and start from scratch.
Hear hear! The precautionary principle is the root cause of this useless tax.
Kd
Climate delusionals? 🙂
First principles?
Well documented elsewhere?
Do you mean the veritable mountains of contradictory reports that look more like what Walter Starck calls 'an academic pissing contest'?
Chuckle.
I'm assuming from your comment that your answer to my straight forward question is that the last 2 decades of real time data is wrong?
I'm also led to assume that you think taxing CO2 is going to 'fix it'? (whatever 'it' now is).
Political?
Read back over the comments with an objective eye and see if you can spot the blogger who keeps making the generalised rhetorical political comments.
I'm not all that enamoured with the politics from any angle in this debate.
The politics and associated bureaucratic institutions have effectively prevented any genuine encouragement of human ingenuity.
So called 'global climate action' and that ridiculously counter productive Precautionary Principle have much to answer for.
'As to my granny?'
Yeah, generalisations are not helpful. I unreservedly retract any slur on grandmothers.
I have been battling nannys on the blogosphere for years...they accuse me of being indifferent to the fate of their grandchildren when I state that sea level has stopped rising and there is nothing to be afraid of.