Various media have been reporting that in the Arctic about a million more square miles of ocean are covered in ice this August than just last year. This is apparently an increase of 60 percent. 
August is usually a low point in the annual cycle, and not so many years ago some were predicting the Arctic would be ice free by August of this year, by 2013.
But if you consider the longer millennial-scale temperature trends as detailed in the technical literature, it is one of summer insolation declining through the Holocene, summer temperatures being generally cooler and the area of Artic ice expanding.
For example...
"As the planet cooled from peak warmth in the early Cenozoic, extensive Northern Hemisphere ice sheets developed by 2.6 Ma ago, leading to changes in the circulation of both the atmosphere and oceans. From w2.6 to w1.0 Ma ago, ice sheets came and went about every 41 ka, in pace with cycles in the tilt of Earth’s axis, but for the past 700 ka, glacial cycles have been longer, lasting w100 ka, separated by brief, warm interglaciations, when sea level and ice volumes were close to present. The cause of the shift from 41 ka to 100 ka glacial cycles is still debated.
"During the penultimate interglaciation, w130 to w120 ka ago, solar energy in summer in the Arctic was greater than at any time subsequently. As a consequence, Arctic summers werew5 C warmer than at present, and almost all glaciers melted completely except for the Greenland Ice Sheet, and even it was reduced in size substantially from its present extent. With the loss of land ice, sea level was about 5 m higher than present, with the extra melt coming from both Greenland and Antarctica as well as small glaciers. The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) peaked w21 ka ago, when mean annual temperatures over parts of the Arctic were as much as 20 C lower than at present.
"Ice recession was well underway 16 ka ago, and most of the Northern Hemisphere ice sheets had melted by 6 ka ago. Solar energy reached a summer maximum (9% higher than at present) w11 ka ago and has been decreasing since then, primarily in response to the precession of the equinoxes. The extra energy elevated early Holocene summer temperatures throughout the Arctic 1e3 C above 20th century averages, enough to completely melt many small glaciers throughout the Arctic, although the Greenland Ice Sheet was only slightly smaller than at present. Early Holocene summer sea ice limits were substantially smaller than their 20th century average, and the flow of Atlantic water into the Arctic Ocean was substantially greater. As summer solar energy decreased in the second half of the Holocene, glaciers reestablished or advanced, sea ice expanded, and the flow of warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Ocean diminished. Late Holocene cooling reached its nadir during the Little Ice Age (about 1250e1850 AD), when sun-blocking volcanic eruptions and perhaps other causes added to the orbital cooling, allowing most Arctic glaciers to reach their maximum Holocene extent. During the warming of the past century, glaciers have receded throughout the Arctic, terrestrial ecosystems have advanced northward, and perennial Arctic Ocean sea ice has diminished...
from Temperature and precipitation history of the Arctic
Miller et al. 2010. Quarternary Science Reviews 29:1679-1715
Image of sea ice extent from http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/. Click on this image for a larger and better view.
Graeme
Go to the BOM website and and look for their 'high quality' sites... they provide daily data for rainfall and also temperature for many localities... and you can download as an excel file... then start charting...
rainfall data tends to go back further in time for more localities. if you want a long temp series for Brisbane, as an example, you need to string three sites together because they keep moving the site...
but there are sites with long series, for example, find Bathurst and also Observatory Hill as follows...
this is what some of it looks like... https://climatelab.com.au/2012/05/basil-beamish-for-climate-commissioner/
Yeah, I was generally aware of those things but I am curious about the actual magnitude of real temps, especially in Oz, for specific locations. This comes from discussions I was having elsewhere. What is the actual temp data for a specific location? The CET gives us an example from way back that includes the LIA so provides some sense of the bigger picture. But of course we don't have that for Oz, so what is actually happening here? I know that's really two questions, but still...
So if I looked at the temps for say Longreach or Cowra as they are recorded, what would it show for as long as we have them. I guess that data is on BoM? Does Wolfram just use that?
Looking at the bigger picture, is there any idea what temps were on average BEFORE the LIA? If sceptics argue we are recovering from the LIA, what are we recovering to?
I am sure this has been discussed add infinitum over the years, I just haven't seen it summarised in handy graphs or in real temps.
While raw temps may have drawbacks, I'd like to see them as unadjusted as possible because even with whatever observational errors are involved, they will still show the broader trend.
So I just wondered if anyone knew of some obvious places to look...
Graeme the CET is the oldest temp record in the world. There are other messy records from Holland, Ireland etc but they start in the 1750s I think. But all NH.
OZ records are not used pre 1900 by our BOM and perhaps after 1910 is the new norm. Most USA records only exist from about 1850 I think but may be used more generally from 1880.
But just about everyone agrees that there was a LIA during which many glaciers reached max advance for the holocene.
But the planet has been slowly warming for about 300 years and most claim the LIA finished about 1850. Some say 1900.
I know this is a little OT (alright, a lot!), but does anyone know if there is a decent record of temps (actuals, not anomalies) from 1650 until today? I saw the CET one posted here a while back but wondered if there were others? I'd also be interested in any graphs for Australia from as far back as possible until today? Without adjustments, ie raw.
I ask just because I have never actually seen what is going on for Australia in raw temp terms. I play with Wolfram Alpha and it never shows anywhere in Oz having any noticeable trend one way or the other (a bit up for some, a bit down for others).
For example:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=temperature+canberra+australia+since+1900
Steve Mc is also worried about that AR5:
"Mann et al 2008 did not only use bristlecones and contaminated Tiljander sediments for its NH reconstruction, but for its Southern Hemisphere reconstruction. While IPCC did not place great confidence in Mann’s SH reconstruction, it is not clear that it contains any usable scientific information on SH temperature history."
But like the current change in the up-trend in GAT, the change in the down-trend in Arctic ice cannot be contemplated.
Natural variation just does not happen, EVAH!
And besides, we have an AR5 to get out very soon.
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/the-specious-long-term-trend/
"So, ‘about a million square miles’ and ’60% increase’ is a monumental media rounding fail. Any common ground there?"
Try this Poly. Looks like better than 60% to me for the 14th Sept both years. 4.2million this year compared with 2.6 million last year:
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/old_icecover.uk.php
Yes Poly please do tell.
Are you claiming that AGW didn't morph into Climate Change?
Seriously?
And did you actually notice that the language has indeed changed from ice extent/2013 to ice volume/2015?
poly
Please do not attempt to rewrite history, it’s the internet…
Now that is what I call rich or even hypocrisy.
The warmist brigade did nothing but rewrite history and 'adjust' records to suit.
Please tell us about the 'Demonstrably untrue' nature of changing terminology!
Wild goose chase haku fer sd.
Wild nights. The wild geese
fly. Time's arrow confusion,
going or coming?