Wanting to find a list of peer-reviewed papers supporting an alternative perspective on climate change? It's just been compiled by the geeks at popular technology.net
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html#Preface
So much for the false statement by Al Gore in 2000 that:
"There was a massive study of every scientific article in a peer reviewed article written on global warming in the last ten years. They took a big sample of 10 percent, 928 articles. And you know the number of those that disagreed with the scientific consensus that we’re causing global warming and that is a serious problem out of the 928: Zero. The misconception that there is disagreement about the science has been deliberately created by a relatively small number of people."
The list includes 1350 plus papers on a range of topic:
Climate Sensitivity
Antarctica
Arctic
Clouds
Coral Reefs
Deaths
Disease
Ecological
Glaciers
Greenland
Gulf Stream
Hockey Stick
Medieval Warm Period
Roman Warm Period
Ocean Acidification
Permafrost
Polar Bears
Sea Level
Species Extinctions
--------------------------------------
Natural Disasters
Droughts, Floods
Earthquakes
Heat Waves
Hurricanes
Storms
Tornadoes
Wildfires
--------------------------------------
Satellite Temperatures
Urban Heat Island
Weather Stations
--------------------------------------
1,500-Year Climate Cycle
CO2 Lags Temperature
Cosmic Rays
Lunar
Solar
Right on cue and exactly as I predicted
Talk about roping a dope...guffaw
americanthinker - ROFL
Here is another item along the same theme.
Now watch the alarmanistas and their moronic spokes personages go ape over WHO is saying it, not WHAT is being said.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/02/climate_consensus_con_game.html
On the list it goes.
Note to self ... must look up the precise definitions of malfeasance and misfeasance and their application here. hmmm
More vacuous nonsense from village idiot acting as the self appointed spokes person of the climatariat.
No where have I said or even intimated that the unqualified should get free kicks or indicated that democracy is a bad thing.
...sheer paranoia and desperation to fill the voids....with complete rubbish as per usual.
Just gets added to the list
"Over at climate audit Steve continues his relentless pursuit of the Mann donkey." yes what a pathetic grub he is. Typical denialist tactic - Maccer is a one man band denial of service attack.
Minsey hates PR - would prefer his unqualified mates to get a free kick or just go the free for all. Let's all have a bash at neurosurgery - how hard could it be?
Blog rednecks - the force that keeps giving and why democracy is probably a bad thing.