• Home
  • /
  • Blog
  • /
  • Go Boldly and Smash all Preconceptions: Steve Goddard
Information Opinion

Go Boldly and Smash all Preconceptions: Steve Goddard

By jennifer
September 4, 2014
Go Boldly and Smash all Preconceptions: Steve Goddard

WE all have heroes. British biologist Thomas Henry Huxley (1825-1895) is one of mine. The contemporary of Charles Darwin wrote: “Sit down before facts as a little child, be prepared to give up every conceived notion, follow humbly wherever and whatever abysses nature leads, or you will learn nothing.”

I have done this for many temperature series: especially maximum temperature series and for many different localities around Australia, even the Bathurst jail because it has an exceptionally long record beginning in 1857. I have also trawled through some archives boxes, and wished I had time to examine more.

I have slowly developed a picture in my mind of what an amalgamation of all the records might look like. I like to develop my ideas slowly and from the bottom-up. I like detail and am often convinced, until I double check again, that I might have got something wrong.

Then along comes well-known American cyclist, blogger, geologist and electrical engineer, oh and also sceptic, Steve Goddard aka Tony Heller. He announced on Twitter a couple of days ago: I am bored with US temperatures, and have turned my attention to climate fraud in Oz.

He starts with a few odd charts at his Twitter feed. I provided some feed back and then he posts ‘Australian Afternoons Used to Be Much Hotter'. The title and the chart excited me like only an entomologist can get excited when someone has suddenly completed the collection for them.

The chart is as I imaged the maximum temperature trends for, at least eastern Australia, would look like after all my station data was amalgamated. Steve’s methodology is very straightforward: There are 1,655 Australian stations in the GHCN (Global Historical Climatology Network) database that include temperature data. The database is located here: ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/daily/all/. The station list is at bottom. The database includes maximum temperatures. He averages the daily data for each month at each station over the lifespan of the station to generate a monthly mean, and then calculates anomalies from the monthly mean. The numbers in his charts are the average anomaly across all stations for all records during a year.

Screen Shot 2014-09-04 at 9.40.01 PM

What Steve’s chart shows is that it was much hotter in the late 1800s, than at any time since and by a significant margin. He has suggested that 1878 is the hottest year on record. Coincidentally my scrutiny of data from the Bathurst jail weather station had already turned-up the hottest day in that record as being January 12, 1878.

There is a cooling trend to about 1960, and then temperatures start to warm again. But they never reach the highs of the late 1800s and early 20th Century.

Ten years ago, when I started this blog, my daughter wanted to be the first to leave a comment and she wrote: “Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path, and leave a trail.” Ralph Waldo Emerson.

Steve Goddard has just done this with the Australian temperature record. He has gone where no-one has dared go before. Thank you, Steve.

Good Causes

Comments

  1. Thank you for your brave efforts with Steven Goddard to unravel the five-year (2014 - 2009 = 5 yr) old Climategate mystery.

    From information in the autobiographies of two great scientists - Fred Hoyle (astronomer, astrophysicist and cosmologist) and Paul Kazuo Kuroda (nuclear geochemist) - I am convinced that the mystery began sixty-four years (2009 - 1945 = 64 yr) earlier, in the chaotic closing days of the Second World War.

    The evidence is summarized here: “Solar energy,” Advances in Astronomy(submitted 1 Sept 2014) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy.pdf

  2. Jennifer wrote:
    "Then along comes well-known American cyclist, blogger, geologist and electrical engineer, oh and also sceptic, Steve Goddard aka Tony Heller. He announced on Twitter a couple of days ago: I am bored with US temperatures, and have turned my attention to climate fraud in Oz."

    He's also a footy aficionado.

  3. You see, this can't be science. My logic: if people with millions in grant money cannot find this, this can't be science. See? As an aside I would like to know what would happen if we could find a very good statistician who knows absolutely NOTHING about the current climate debate and gave him/her all the data that went into the NOAA series and models and let him/her think it's about the incidence of some epidemic or shoe sizes or whatever. Then let that person do his or her best to mine these data and come up with trends and correlations. While I may be biased I have an inkling where this impartial audit might lead ...

  4. Interesting info from blogger Greg Goodman at WUWT about the increase in SST in the N pacific. IOW producing more ice in the Arctic releases a lot more heat.

    Greg Goodman

    September 6, 2014 at 8:38 am

    As Bob noted in his last post on this, almost all of the warming in SST is in N. Pacific.

    To be more precise it is centred on Berring Sea area and also Labrador Str between Canada and Greenland.

    This article mentions the effects of evaporation but it is the latent heat of fusion ( freezing/melting ) of water that may be more pertinent.

    A quick back of envelope calculation using phycical properties of pure water rather than sea water shows that freesing 1kg of water releases enough heat to warm 100kg of water by 0.8K. That is about the current anomaly in those regions.

    The SST shown has been climbing since 2012. That was the low point of arctic sea ice coverage. There was a recovery in ice volume of 50% in 2013. That implies an enormous transfer of energy, initally to surrounding water.

    It looks like that may be the origin of the recent rise.

    Maps shown in Bob’s post show most of the rest of the world is showing very neutral SST anomalies.

    Most of this warming could be due to the Arctic ice recovery.

  5. So, I didn't get much sleep but I did extract the Bathurst series from the file (downloaded from an FTP site at the BOM about 6 years ago. all credit to JS) with all of the data as detailed in Table 1 of Torok and Nicholls 1996.

    Regarding the homogenisation undertaken by Torok and Nicholls… well it was much milder than the two versions (HQ and ACORN-SAT) that have followed.

    You want numbers… Nah. I'm going to write this up for peer review. 😉

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *